Easement Real Estate Dispute Attorneys
A mortgage is a lien that provides a lender with the right to seize property if the borrower fails to pay a debt. While the term “mortgage” is often used to refer to the loan used to purchase the property, it is actually an interest in real property that is held by the lender.
Mortgage laws vary by state, but nearly every state has adopted systems based on one of two legal theories. In lien theory states, the borrower takes legal title to the property while the lender holds a lien on it for the life of the loan. In states that have adopted the title theory of mortgages, the lender holds title to the property for the life of the loan while the borrower retains equitable title, which allows the borrower to occupy and use the property.
Whichever theory has been adopted by the state where the mortgaged property is located, when the borrower falls behind on loan payments the lender will take steps to seize the property through foreclosure. The foreclosure proceedings will be governed by state law and the terms of the mortgage. If the borrowers believe the lender is foreclosing in error, they will have the opportunity to contest it.
In states with judicial foreclosure, the borrowers will receive a summons and complaint notifying them of the lender’s foreclosure action. If the borrowers seek to contest the foreclosure, they will need to file an answer by the court’s deadline. Should the lender find the defendant’s objection to the foreclosure has merit, it may choose to negotiate an out-of-court settlement prior to trial. However, that is uncommon and in most cases the lender will file for summary judgment, which asks the court to dispose of the case in its favor without going to trial.
A motion for summary judgment argues that there is no genuine dispute of material fact and that the other party cannot prevail. If the borrower can provide evidence of a genuine dispute, the judge will determine whether the case will proceed to trial. If the judge agrees with the lender that there is no genuine issue of material fact, the court will grant summary judgment its favor and allow the lender to move forward with the foreclosure sale. Otherwise, the judge will allow the case to continue to trial.
A number of states allow for non-judicial foreclosure, which puts the burden on the homeowner to bring a court action challenging the foreclosure. Since the borrowers file the legal action in non-judicial foreclosures, they have the burden of proof for showing the litigation should move forward. That is because the mortgage grants the lender the right to foreclose on the property for non-payment and the borrowers are asking the court to deny the lender its contractual rights. Should the borrower show it has valid grounds for challenging the foreclosure, the court will issue an injunction stopping it until a judge can decide the issue.
Mortgage lien disputes are complex legal matters and both sides should be represented by well-qualified, knowledgeable real estate attorneys. The attorneys at Thomas H. Curran Associates have extensive experience representing both lenders and borrowers in mortgage litigation and can advise both on their best course of action with regard to their case. Since our lawyers have a deep understanding of both sides of the issue they are also skilled in negotiating solutions that will spare the parties the cost of litigation.
Litigation Practice Results
Recent successful cases handled by the attorneys at Thomas H. Curran Associates. Find more here »
Foreclosure of residential and commercial real property varies by state because each one has its own laws governing the process and addressing such issues as the property owner’s options for bringing the loan current and the process for selling the property. Generally, foreclosures fall into two categories: (i) by judicial process or (ii) by statutory power of sale contained in the mortgage. Thomas H. Curran Associates mortgage foreclosure lawyers have conducted foreclosures under both methods in various states. The Firm has also served as foreclosure defense attorneys in certain cases. In many cases, Thomas H. Curran Associates’s lawyers also represent lenders and servicers in bankruptcy courts in cases that arise in connection with foreclosure proceedings. Individuals and businesses facing foreclosure should seek experienced legal counsel as early as possible to understand their rights, evaluate available options, and determine whether negotiation, litigation, or other legal remedies may help protect their interests.
In states that require judicial foreclosure, mortgagees must commence a foreclosure lawsuit asking the court for the right to sell the property in satisfaction of the underlying debt. Throughout the litigation, both lenders and borrowers may face complex procedural and evidentiary issues that require experienced legal representation. Judicial foreclosure is the primary method of foreclosure used in 22 states, including Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. When the state allows for it, the lender’s attorneys may ask the court to grant it a deficiency judgment if selling the property is not expected to fully pay off the borrower’s debt. If granted, the borrower will remain responsible for any unpaid debt following the foreclosure sale. Alternatively, there are 28 states that allow for non-judicial foreclosures, including Massachusetts, California, Texas, and Georgia. In those states, the mortgage foreclosure process is typically faster because it does not originate through the courts unless the borrower chooses to sue the lender.
The last significant U.S. economic downtown that began in or around 2008 stemmed in large part from the excesses of the home mortgage sector of our economy and related substandard lending practices. The resulting nationwide wave of foreclosures spawned years of litigation challenging mortgagees and lenders and servicers’ right to foreclose mortgages. This foreclosure litigation resulted in many novel legal theories to prevent foreclosure. Thomas H. Curran Associates’s lawyers have years of experience successfully litigating an array of mortgage foreclosure cases that raised numerous complex and novel defenses across multiple jurisdictions in both state courts and bankruptcy courts, with some cases resulting in complex appellate proceedings. The Firm also has deep expertise in ancillary relief such as receiverships and injunction proceedings that are sometimes required to secure the property during the foreclosure process.
By virtue of their broad and deep foreclosure and bankruptcy expertise, the attorneys at Thomas H. Curran Associates are uniquely positioned to advise and represent mortgage lenders and servicers, as well as borrowers in some cases, with their foreclosure proceedings. Our lawyers seek to utilize their experience advocating on behalf of clients to provide them with quality representation while assisting them in prosecuting or defending their foreclosure proceedings in the fastest, most efficient manner.
Thomas H. Curran Associates Secures Appellate Victory in Insurance Coverage Dispute
In a significant legal victory, Thomas H. Curran Associates (THCA), representing the Plaintiff-Appellant, successfully overturned a trial...
Supreme Court Denies Final Appeal, Finalizing Judgement Obtained by THCA
On June 24, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States declined the petition to review filed by Sean Dunne and his ex-wife Gayle...
Thomas H. Curran Associates Secures Appellate Victory as Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Denies Appellant’s Attempt to Shortcut Ordinary Appellate Review
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently obtained an appellate victory in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on May 26, 2023, in the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates win is Affirmed in Florida, U.S. District Court – Client Wins Attorneys Fees
Law: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) Case: Premier Capital, LLC v. Larry Bryan (AP) Underlying Bankruptcy Case: In re Larry Bryan...
The Second Circuit Affirms Bankruptcy Fraud Judgment Obtained by Thomas H. Curran Associates, Recognizing the Continuous Concealment Doctrine
Law: Continuous concealment doctrine, 11 USC § 727(a)(2)(A), In re Olivier, 819 F.2d 550 (5th Cir. 1987); In re Boyer, 328 F. App’x 711,...
Thomas H. Curran Associates prevails on barring discharge due to fraud by debtor
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently secured a victory on behalf of an institutional asset manager, where the Bankruptcy Court for the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates Secures Appellate Victory in Insurance Coverage Dispute
In a significant legal victory, Thomas H. Curran Associates (THCA), representing the Plaintiff-Appellant, successfully overturned a trial...
Supreme Court Denies Final Appeal, Finalizing Judgement Obtained by THCA
On June 24, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States declined the petition to review filed by Sean Dunne and his ex-wife Gayle...
Thomas H. Curran Associates Secures Appellate Victory as Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Denies Appellant’s Attempt to Shortcut Ordinary Appellate Review
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently obtained an appellate victory in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on May 26, 2023, in the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates win is Affirmed in Florida, U.S. District Court – Client Wins Attorneys Fees
Law: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) Case: Premier Capital, LLC v. Larry Bryan (AP) Underlying Bankruptcy Case: In re Larry Bryan...
Thomas H. Curran Associates Secures Appellate Victory in Insurance Coverage Dispute
In a significant legal victory, Thomas H. Curran Associates (THCA), representing the Plaintiff-Appellant, successfully overturned a trial...
Supreme Court Denies Final Appeal, Finalizing Judgement Obtained by THCA
On June 24, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States declined the petition to review filed by Sean Dunne and his ex-wife Gayle...
Thomas H. Curran Associates Secures Appellate Victory as Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Denies Appellant’s Attempt to Shortcut Ordinary Appellate Review
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently obtained an appellate victory in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on May 26, 2023, in the...
Litigation Areas of Expertise
Litigation News
The State of Healthcare Bankruptcy in the U.S.: Why 2025 Is a Turning Point
Jennifer Riggins sits down with Thomas Curran, Managing Partner of Thomas H. Curran Associates, to unpack the accelerating wave of...
Expanding in the Southwest: From Insolvency in Oklahoma to Asset Recovery in Texas
In this episode, Jennifer sits down with Thomas Curran, founder of Thomas H. Curran Associates, to explore the rapidly evolving world of...
Disciplinary judge approves lawyer’s suspension for using ChatGPT to generate fake cases | Colorado Politics
Recently, a Colorado lawyer received disciplinary action for employing artificial intelligence to generate fake case citations in a legal...
US appeals court proposes AI restrictions in all court filings | Jurist
In November, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit proposed a new rule requiring lawyers to certify that they either did not use...
Mallinckrodt’s Second Bankruptcy Would cut $1 Billion from Opioid Settlement | STL Today
The Irish based company, Mallinckrodt’s, second bankruptcy may place creditors in ownership of the company and cut $1 billion from the...
The FTC’s case against Microsoft’s Activision acquisition is not going well | Vox
Microsoft and Activision Blizzard are overcoming hurdles to their $69 billion dollar merger. If the merger goes through, Microsoft will...
The State of Healthcare Bankruptcy in the U.S.: Why 2025 Is a Turning Point
Jennifer Riggins sits down with Thomas Curran, Managing Partner of Thomas H. Curran Associates, to unpack the accelerating wave of...
Expanding in the Southwest: From Insolvency in Oklahoma to Asset Recovery in Texas
In this episode, Jennifer sits down with Thomas Curran, founder of Thomas H. Curran Associates, to explore the rapidly evolving world of...
Disciplinary judge approves lawyer’s suspension for using ChatGPT to generate fake cases | Colorado Politics
Recently, a Colorado lawyer received disciplinary action for employing artificial intelligence to generate fake case citations in a legal...
US appeals court proposes AI restrictions in all court filings | Jurist
In November, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit proposed a new rule requiring lawyers to certify that they either did not use...
The State of Healthcare Bankruptcy in the U.S.: Why 2025 Is a Turning Point
Jennifer Riggins sits down with Thomas Curran, Managing Partner of Thomas H. Curran Associates, to unpack the accelerating wave of...
Expanding in the Southwest: From Insolvency in Oklahoma to Asset Recovery in Texas
In this episode, Jennifer sits down with Thomas Curran, founder of Thomas H. Curran Associates, to explore the rapidly evolving world of...
Disciplinary judge approves lawyer’s suspension for using ChatGPT to generate fake cases | Colorado Politics
Recently, a Colorado lawyer received disciplinary action for employing artificial intelligence to generate fake case citations in a legal...
Contact Us
Are You In Need of Legal Counsel for Commercial Litigation, Business Transaction Matters, or a Bankruptcy Matter?
Contact our team today.
Call us at (617) 207-8670 or click the button below.
Austin Office
7710 N. FM 620
Building 13-D
Austin, TX 78726
Boston Office
15 Broad Street
Suite 610
Boston, MA 02109
New York Office
305 Broadway, Suite 700
New York, NY 10007
London Office
The Leadenhall Building
Level 30
122 Leadenhall Street
London EC3V 4AB
Tags: mortgage litigation attorney mortgage dispute attorney mortgage litigation lawyer




