Cross Border Foreign Litigation
The global nature of the commercial, financial, real estate and other markets presents a compelling need for attorneys and other professionals with an understanding of cross border bankruptcy law. International insolvency laws present a complex landscape within which bankruptcy practitioners must navigate, with an eye towards conflicting bankruptcy regimes, class priorities, foreign substantive law, principles of comity and an array of other foreign bankruptcy and non-bankruptcy legal issues. Whether engaged by U.S. or foreign clients, Thomas H. Curran Associates’s expertise in this area is indispensable to bankruptcy trustees and creditors seeking to recover assets, initiate investigations or otherwise protect their interests in U.S. or foreign insolvency and bankruptcy proceedings.
The UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross Border Insolvency (“UNCITRAL”) provides an express model statutory framework for adopting countries to enable cross-border recognition of insolvency proceedings that span multiple jurisdictions, which has become more frequent in today’s economy. Although UNCITRAL has been adopted and enacted in many countries (51 jurisdictions as of 2020)1, there remains a lack of uniformity among the various bankruptcy regimes, which impacts the powers and procedures afforded U.S. bankruptcy trustees seeking recognition and relief in a foreign jurisdiction. Thus, despite the adoption of UNCITRAL’s cross-border provisions in Chapter 15 of the United States Bankruptcy Code and foreign locales reciprocal adoptions (e.g. in the U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia and Japan), much of western Europe, South America and elsewhere have not adopted UNCITRAL. This lack of uniformity requires counsel capable of handling often conflicting legal regimes, particularly as they relate to the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and American substantive and procedural law pertaining to recognition, international comity, standing, conflicts of laws, finality, discovery, avoidance, recovery and limitations periods, among many others.
Thomas H. Curran Associates’s lawyers bring their deep knowledge of and experience with U.S. bankruptcy law, state and federal substantive and procedural law, cross border litigation, international principles of recognition, comity and ancillary proceedings to assist and advise clients faced with these challenging legal situations. The Firm has been engaged by trustees and creditors, often working with foreign counsel, foreign trustees, foreign bankruptcy professionals and international litigators, to lead and participate in cross border litigation in the U.K., Italy, Ireland, Cyprus, South Africa, Panama and elsewhere.
[1] See uncitral.un.org/en/texts/insolvency/modellaw/cross-border_insolvency/status
Bankruptcy Practice Results
Recent successful cases handled by the attorneys from Thomas H. Curran Associates. Find more here »
Supreme Court Denies Final Appeal, Finalizing Judgement Obtained by THCA
On June 24, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States declined the petition to review filed by Sean Dunne and his ex-wife Gayle...
Thomas H. Curran Associates Secures Appellate Victory as Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Denies Appellant’s Attempt to Shortcut Ordinary Appellate Review
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently obtained an appellate victory in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on May 26, 2023, in the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates win is Affirmed in Florida, U.S. District Court – Client Wins Attorneys Fees
Law: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) Case: Premier Capital, LLC v. Larry Bryan (AP) Underlying Bankruptcy Case: In re Larry Bryan...
The Second Circuit Affirms Bankruptcy Fraud Judgment Obtained by Thomas H. Curran Associates, Recognizing the Continuous Concealment Doctrine
Law: Continuous concealment doctrine, 11 USC § 727(a)(2)(A), In re Olivier, 819 F.2d 550 (5th Cir. 1987); In re Boyer, 328 F. App’x 711,...
Thomas H. Curran Associates prevails on barring discharge due to fraud by debtor
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently secured a victory on behalf of an institutional asset manager, where the Bankruptcy Court for the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates prevails on post-trial motions and obtains full security for $23 million dollar financial fraud judgment on behalf of chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee
On February 8, 2022, the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Meyer, J.) enter its Order denying defendant Gayle...
Supreme Court Denies Final Appeal, Finalizing Judgement Obtained by THCA
On June 24, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States declined the petition to review filed by Sean Dunne and his ex-wife Gayle...
Thomas H. Curran Associates Secures Appellate Victory as Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Denies Appellant’s Attempt to Shortcut Ordinary Appellate Review
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently obtained an appellate victory in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on May 26, 2023, in the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates win is Affirmed in Florida, U.S. District Court – Client Wins Attorneys Fees
Law: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) Case: Premier Capital, LLC v. Larry Bryan (AP) Underlying Bankruptcy Case: In re Larry Bryan...
The Second Circuit Affirms Bankruptcy Fraud Judgment Obtained by Thomas H. Curran Associates, Recognizing the Continuous Concealment Doctrine
Law: Continuous concealment doctrine, 11 USC § 727(a)(2)(A), In re Olivier, 819 F.2d 550 (5th Cir. 1987); In re Boyer, 328 F. App’x 711,...
Supreme Court Denies Final Appeal, Finalizing Judgement Obtained by THCA
On June 24, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States declined the petition to review filed by Sean Dunne and his ex-wife Gayle...
Thomas H. Curran Associates Secures Appellate Victory as Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Denies Appellant’s Attempt to Shortcut Ordinary Appellate Review
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently obtained an appellate victory in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on May 26, 2023, in the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates win is Affirmed in Florida, U.S. District Court – Client Wins Attorneys Fees
Law: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) Case: Premier Capital, LLC v. Larry Bryan (AP) Underlying Bankruptcy Case: In re Larry Bryan...
Bankruptcy Areas of Expertise
- Bankruptcy Litigation
- Bankruptcy Trustee Representation
- Avoidance & Recovery Actions
- Chapter 11 Trustees & Examiners
- Discharge Litigation
- Bankruptcy Fraud Investigations
- Cross Border Foreign Litigation
- 363 Bankruptcy Sales
- Bankruptcy Preference Actions
- Involuntary Bankruptcy
- Chapter 11/13 Plan Objections
Bankruptcy News
Evidence of Intent to ‘Hinder’ Wasn’t Sufficient to Deny Discharge, District Judge Says
In the recent case Wylie v. Miller, 22-10952 (S.D. Mich. March 29, 2024) [1] , a bankruptcy court’s decision to deny a couple’s discharge...
Creditor’s Don’t Receive Estate Assets Recovered After the Last Chapter 13 Plan Payment
In In re McCrorey, 18-00696 (Bankr. D. Idaho Jan. 26, 2024) [1] , Chief Bankruptcy Judge Noah G. Hillen of Boise, Idaho, held that if a...
Electric Scooter Company Bird files for Bankruptcy | CNBC
Bird, the popular electric scooter rental company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Florida Federal Court last month. Bird's...
Nearly 20-year-old Dallas restaurant chain files for Ch. 7 bankruptcy | WFAA-TV
The Dallas-based company Buzzbrews Inc. filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection lasat month in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the...
A Refinanced Consumer Loan Might Not Be a ‘Consumer Debt,’ Ninth Circuit Says
In Centennial Bank v. Kane (In re Kane), 22-16282 (9th Cir. Nov. 15, 2023), the debtor had refinanced four preexisting loans. [1] The...
Bankruptcy Code Overrides Contrary Delaware Corporate Law, Judge Lopez Says
In In re Envision Healthcare Corp., 23-90342 (Bankr. S.D. Tx. Sec. 12, 2023), Bankruptcy Judge Christopher M. Lopez held that Delaware law...
Evidence of Intent to ‘Hinder’ Wasn’t Sufficient to Deny Discharge, District Judge Says
In the recent case Wylie v. Miller, 22-10952 (S.D. Mich. March 29, 2024) [1] , a bankruptcy court’s decision to deny a couple’s discharge...
Creditor’s Don’t Receive Estate Assets Recovered After the Last Chapter 13 Plan Payment
In In re McCrorey, 18-00696 (Bankr. D. Idaho Jan. 26, 2024) [1] , Chief Bankruptcy Judge Noah G. Hillen of Boise, Idaho, held that if a...
Electric Scooter Company Bird files for Bankruptcy | CNBC
Bird, the popular electric scooter rental company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Florida Federal Court last month. Bird's...
Nearly 20-year-old Dallas restaurant chain files for Ch. 7 bankruptcy | WFAA-TV
The Dallas-based company Buzzbrews Inc. filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection lasat month in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the...
Evidence of Intent to ‘Hinder’ Wasn’t Sufficient to Deny Discharge, District Judge Says
In the recent case Wylie v. Miller, 22-10952 (S.D. Mich. March 29, 2024) [1] , a bankruptcy court’s decision to deny a couple’s discharge...
Creditor’s Don’t Receive Estate Assets Recovered After the Last Chapter 13 Plan Payment
In In re McCrorey, 18-00696 (Bankr. D. Idaho Jan. 26, 2024) [1] , Chief Bankruptcy Judge Noah G. Hillen of Boise, Idaho, held that if a...
Electric Scooter Company Bird files for Bankruptcy | CNBC
Bird, the popular electric scooter rental company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Florida Federal Court last month. Bird's...
Contact Us
Are You In Need of Legal Counsel for a Bankruptcy Matter, Business Transaction, or Commercial Litigation?
Contact our team today.
Call us at (617) 207-8670 or use the quick contact form below.
Austin Office
111 Congress Avenue
Suite 500
Austin, TX 78701
Boston Office
75 State St
Suite 100
Boston, MA 02109
New York Office
1740 Broadway
15th Floor
New York, NY 10019
London Office
The Leadenhall Building
Level 30
122 Leadenhall Street
London EC3V 4AB
Tags: cross border foreign litigation international insolvency cross border bankruptcy