Select Page

Shareholder & Close Corporation Actions

A corporation’s shareholders often have little power to control its day-to-day management. To run the corporation, the shareholders elect a board of directors to oversee its operations and hire officers who manage the company. It is the directors and officers who are charged with protecting the corporation and its shareholders.

However, by virtue of owning shares in the corporation, individual shareholders do have some power to affect change within the corporation through legal action. Most shareholder litigation falls into two categories: direct claims and derivative lawsuits.

Direct claims are filed by shareholders seeking to assert a claim that the board of directors, officers, or majority shareholders have engaged in misconduct and seek damages. Direct claims are often used by shareholders in close corporations and can offer protection to minority shareholders who are being treated unfairly by the majority shareholders. Close corporations are those where the stock is not freely traded and is generally held by only a few shareholders.

The reasons a shareholder might file a direct claim can range from illegal acts by directors or officers to management decisions that resulted in regulatory enforcement or litigation. But, as a general rule, direct claims against a corporate director or officer require a shareholder to show it has suffered harm that the other shareholders did not suffer. Finally, shareholders are rarely able to bring direct actions for breach of fiduciary duty unless the shareholder can show that the duty existed outside of their corporate relationship.

Derivative lawsuits are brought by a shareholder on behalf of the corporation, not in the plaintiff’s capacity as an individual shareholder. In essence, derivative lawsuits claim misconduct by the company’s board or management resulted in harm to the corporation. As a result, any damages from a derivative lawsuit will be awarded to the corporation and not the shareholder bringing the action.

Common grounds for derivative lawsuits include the following:

  • Breach of fiduciary duty;
  • Fraud or unlawful activities;
  • Self-dealing by directors or officers;
  • Conflicts of interest;
  • Waste of corporate assets;
  • False, misleading, or inflated financial statements;
  • Accounting fraud;
  • Inflated executive compensation; and
  • Decisions by officers or directors exposing the corporation to harm.

Even when the actions of a corporation’s directors or officers cause harm to a corporation, a court may still apply the business judgment rule to dismiss a derivative lawsuit when there is evidence the actions were undertaken in good faith.

The experienced attorneys at Thomas H. Curran Associates have the skills necessary to represent shareholders in close corporations seeking to preserve their rights in disputes or shareholders seeking to file a derivative lawsuit against corporate management. They can also represent directors and officers defending themselves from a wide variety of shareholder actions. Our attorneys have a deep understanding of shareholder actions and the legal knowledge to litigate them successfully.

Litigation Practice Results

Recent successful cases handled by the attorneys at Thomas H. Curran Associates. Find more here »

Foreclosure of residential and commercial real property varies by state because each one has its own laws governing the process and addressing such issues as the property owner’s options for bringing the loan current and the process for selling the property. Generally, foreclosures fall into two categories: (i) by judicial process or (ii) by statutory power of sale contained in the mortgage. Thomas H. Curran Associates mortgage foreclosure lawyers have conducted foreclosures under both methods in various states. The Firm has also served as foreclosure defense attorneys in certain cases. In many cases, Thomas H. Curran Associates’s lawyers also represent lenders and servicers in bankruptcy courts in cases that arise in connection with foreclosure proceedings. Individuals and businesses facing foreclosure should seek experienced legal counsel as early as possible to understand their rights, evaluate available options, and determine whether negotiation, litigation, or other legal remedies may help protect their interests.

In states that require judicial foreclosure, mortgagees must commence a foreclosure lawsuit asking the court for the right to sell the property in satisfaction of the underlying debt. Throughout the litigation, both lenders and borrowers may face complex procedural and evidentiary issues that require experienced legal representation. Judicial foreclosure is the primary method of foreclosure used in 22 states, including Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. When the state allows for it, the lender’s attorneys may ask the court to grant it a deficiency judgment if selling the property is not expected to fully pay off the borrower’s debt. If granted, the borrower will remain responsible for any unpaid debt following the foreclosure sale. Alternatively, there are 28 states that allow for non-judicial foreclosures, including Massachusetts, California, Texas, and Georgia. In those states, the mortgage foreclosure process is typically faster because it does not originate through the courts unless the borrower chooses to sue the lender.

The last significant U.S. economic downtown that began in or around 2008 stemmed in large part from the excesses of the home mortgage sector of our economy and related substandard lending practices. The resulting nationwide wave of foreclosures spawned years of litigation challenging mortgagees and lenders and servicers’ right to foreclose mortgages. This foreclosure litigation resulted in many novel legal theories to prevent foreclosure. Thomas H. Curran Associates’s lawyers have years of experience successfully litigating an array of mortgage foreclosure cases that raised numerous complex and novel defenses across multiple jurisdictions in both state courts and bankruptcy courts, with some cases resulting in complex appellate proceedings. The Firm also has deep expertise in ancillary relief such as receiverships and injunction proceedings that are sometimes required to secure the property during the foreclosure process.

By virtue of their broad and deep foreclosure and bankruptcy expertise, the attorneys at Thomas H. Curran Associates are uniquely positioned to advise and represent mortgage lenders and servicers, as well as borrowers in some cases, with their foreclosure proceedings. Our lawyers seek to utilize their experience advocating on behalf of clients to provide them with quality representation while assisting them in prosecuting or defending their foreclosure proceedings in the fastest, most efficient manner.

Litigation News

Contact Us

Are You In Need of Legal Counsel for Commercial Litigation, Business Transaction Matters, or a Bankruptcy Matter?

Contact our team today.

Call us at (617) 207-8670 or click the button below.

Austin Office

7710 N. FM 620
Building 13-D
Austin, TX 78726

Boston Office

15 Broad Street
Suite 610
Boston, MA 02109

New York Office

305 Broadway, Suite 700
New York, NY 10007

London Office

The Leadenhall Building
Level 30
122 Leadenhall Street
London EC3V 4AB

Tags:   shareholder and close corporation actions shareholder and minority shareholder and derivative lawsuit shareholder disputes

Pin It on Pinterest