Discharge Bankruptcy Attorney
Thomas H. Curran Associates’s attorneys are among the most experienced bankruptcy and litigation attorneys prosecuting and defending objections to bankruptcy debtors’ discharge. The Firm’s lawyers are deeply knowledgeable about the latest developments in the complex law affecting a debtor’s right to discharge. Their trial and appellate decisions have been published in numerous Bankruptcy, District and Circuit courts.
While the Bankruptcy Code provides honest debtors with a post-petition “fresh start” under Chapter 7, a debtor must comply with the Bankruptcy Code’s disclosure, turnover and record keeping provisions that enable the trustee and creditors to fully understand a debtor’s pre-petition business and financial affairs. In essence, the Code treats the bankruptcy discharge as a privilege, not a right. Should a debtor fail to fulfill the Code’s disclosure and other obligations, she may lose her discharge and the “fresh start” available through Bankruptcy Code s. 727. In that case, a debtor loses the benefit of shedding her pre-petition debts.
Representing Creditors and Trustees. Thomas H. Curran Associates’s attorneys, on behalf of the Firm’s creditor or trustee clients, have challenged debtors’ right to a bankruptcy discharge under s. 727 on the basis of the debtors’: (i) false oaths; (ii) fraudulent concealment and/or transfer of assets; (iii) failure to keep records; (iv) failure to explain loss of assets and other enumerated bases for challenging a debtor’s discharge. Relying on their extensive bankruptcy, litigation and investigatory experience, particularly their experience in prosecuting trustee avoidance and recovery actions, the Firm’s lawyers almost always take the lead amongst the trustee and the entire creditor body in ensuring that debtors fulfill their obligations under the letter and spirit of the Bankruptcy Code. Often working alongside the trustee, the Firm’s lawyers have been engaged to prosecute discharge litigation in various bankruptcy courts located in New York, Florida, Nevada, Connecticut, Louisiana, California, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey and Rhode Island.
Representing Debtors. Likewise, Thomas H. Curran Associates’s decades of bankruptcy, litigation and trial experience, deep bankruptcy expertise, and, perhaps most importantly, the Firm’s aggressive and zealous advocacy, provides its debtor clients with unequaled capabilities for defending discharge objection cases brought by trustees and creditors. Debtors can feel confident that Thomas H. Curran Associates will mount the most capable and zealous defenses available under the applicable law and facts of the debtor’s case.
The experienced bankruptcy attorneys at Thomas H. Curran Associates have decades of experience winning and resolving discharge actions and stand ready to advise creditors, trustees and debtors through the complex and high stakes discharge litigation process.
Bankruptcy Practice Results
Recent successful cases handled by the attorneys from Thomas H. Curran Associates. Find more here »
Supreme Court Denies Final Appeal, Finalizing Judgement Obtained by THCA
On June 24, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States declined the petition to review filed by Sean Dunne and his ex-wife Gayle...
Thomas H. Curran Associates Secures Appellate Victory as Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Denies Appellant’s Attempt to Shortcut Ordinary Appellate Review
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently obtained an appellate victory in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on May 26, 2023, in the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates win is Affirmed in Florida, U.S. District Court – Client Wins Attorneys Fees
Law: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) Case: Premier Capital, LLC v. Larry Bryan (AP) Underlying Bankruptcy Case: In re Larry Bryan...
The Second Circuit Affirms Bankruptcy Fraud Judgment Obtained by Thomas H. Curran Associates, Recognizing the Continuous Concealment Doctrine
Law: Continuous concealment doctrine, 11 USC § 727(a)(2)(A), In re Olivier, 819 F.2d 550 (5th Cir. 1987); In re Boyer, 328 F. App’x 711,...
Thomas H. Curran Associates prevails on barring discharge due to fraud by debtor
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently secured a victory on behalf of an institutional asset manager, where the Bankruptcy Court for the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates prevails on post-trial motions and obtains full security for $23 million dollar financial fraud judgment on behalf of chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee
On February 8, 2022, the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Meyer, J.) enter its Order denying defendant Gayle...
Supreme Court Denies Final Appeal, Finalizing Judgement Obtained by THCA
On June 24, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States declined the petition to review filed by Sean Dunne and his ex-wife Gayle...
Thomas H. Curran Associates Secures Appellate Victory as Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Denies Appellant’s Attempt to Shortcut Ordinary Appellate Review
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently obtained an appellate victory in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on May 26, 2023, in the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates win is Affirmed in Florida, U.S. District Court – Client Wins Attorneys Fees
Law: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) Case: Premier Capital, LLC v. Larry Bryan (AP) Underlying Bankruptcy Case: In re Larry Bryan...
The Second Circuit Affirms Bankruptcy Fraud Judgment Obtained by Thomas H. Curran Associates, Recognizing the Continuous Concealment Doctrine
Law: Continuous concealment doctrine, 11 USC § 727(a)(2)(A), In re Olivier, 819 F.2d 550 (5th Cir. 1987); In re Boyer, 328 F. App’x 711,...
Supreme Court Denies Final Appeal, Finalizing Judgement Obtained by THCA
On June 24, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States declined the petition to review filed by Sean Dunne and his ex-wife Gayle...
Thomas H. Curran Associates Secures Appellate Victory as Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Denies Appellant’s Attempt to Shortcut Ordinary Appellate Review
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently obtained an appellate victory in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on May 26, 2023, in the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates win is Affirmed in Florida, U.S. District Court – Client Wins Attorneys Fees
Law: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) Case: Premier Capital, LLC v. Larry Bryan (AP) Underlying Bankruptcy Case: In re Larry Bryan...
Bankruptcy Areas of Expertise
- Bankruptcy Litigation
- Bankruptcy Trustee Representation
- Avoidance & Recovery Actions
- Chapter 11 Trustees & Examiners
- Discharge Litigation
- Bankruptcy Fraud Investigations
- Cross Border Foreign Litigation
- 363 Bankruptcy Sales
- Bankruptcy Preference Actions
- Involuntary Bankruptcy
- Chapter 11/13 Plan Objections
Bankruptcy News
Evidence of Intent to ‘Hinder’ Wasn’t Sufficient to Deny Discharge, District Judge Says
In the recent case Wylie v. Miller, 22-10952 (S.D. Mich. March 29, 2024) [1] , a bankruptcy court’s decision to deny a couple’s discharge...
Creditor’s Don’t Receive Estate Assets Recovered After the Last Chapter 13 Plan Payment
In In re McCrorey, 18-00696 (Bankr. D. Idaho Jan. 26, 2024) [1] , Chief Bankruptcy Judge Noah G. Hillen of Boise, Idaho, held that if a...
Electric Scooter Company Bird files for Bankruptcy | CNBC
Bird, the popular electric scooter rental company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Florida Federal Court last month. Bird's...
Nearly 20-year-old Dallas restaurant chain files for Ch. 7 bankruptcy | WFAA-TV
The Dallas-based company Buzzbrews Inc. filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection lasat month in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the...
A Refinanced Consumer Loan Might Not Be a ‘Consumer Debt,’ Ninth Circuit Says
In Centennial Bank v. Kane (In re Kane), 22-16282 (9th Cir. Nov. 15, 2023), the debtor had refinanced four preexisting loans. [1] The...
Bankruptcy Code Overrides Contrary Delaware Corporate Law, Judge Lopez Says
In In re Envision Healthcare Corp., 23-90342 (Bankr. S.D. Tx. Sec. 12, 2023), Bankruptcy Judge Christopher M. Lopez held that Delaware law...
Evidence of Intent to ‘Hinder’ Wasn’t Sufficient to Deny Discharge, District Judge Says
In the recent case Wylie v. Miller, 22-10952 (S.D. Mich. March 29, 2024) [1] , a bankruptcy court’s decision to deny a couple’s discharge...
Creditor’s Don’t Receive Estate Assets Recovered After the Last Chapter 13 Plan Payment
In In re McCrorey, 18-00696 (Bankr. D. Idaho Jan. 26, 2024) [1] , Chief Bankruptcy Judge Noah G. Hillen of Boise, Idaho, held that if a...
Electric Scooter Company Bird files for Bankruptcy | CNBC
Bird, the popular electric scooter rental company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Florida Federal Court last month. Bird's...
Nearly 20-year-old Dallas restaurant chain files for Ch. 7 bankruptcy | WFAA-TV
The Dallas-based company Buzzbrews Inc. filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection lasat month in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the...
Evidence of Intent to ‘Hinder’ Wasn’t Sufficient to Deny Discharge, District Judge Says
In the recent case Wylie v. Miller, 22-10952 (S.D. Mich. March 29, 2024) [1] , a bankruptcy court’s decision to deny a couple’s discharge...
Creditor’s Don’t Receive Estate Assets Recovered After the Last Chapter 13 Plan Payment
In In re McCrorey, 18-00696 (Bankr. D. Idaho Jan. 26, 2024) [1] , Chief Bankruptcy Judge Noah G. Hillen of Boise, Idaho, held that if a...
Electric Scooter Company Bird files for Bankruptcy | CNBC
Bird, the popular electric scooter rental company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Florida Federal Court last month. Bird's...
Contact Us
Are You In Need of Legal Counsel for a Bankruptcy Matter, Business Transaction, or Commercial Litigation?
Contact our team today.
Call us at (617) 207-8670 or use the quick contact form below.
Austin Office
111 Congress Avenue
Suite 500
Austin, TX 78701
Boston Office
75 State St
Suite 100
Boston, MA 02109
New York Office
1740 Broadway
15th Floor
New York, NY 10019
London Office
The Leadenhall Building
Level 30
122 Leadenhall Street
London EC3V 4AB
Tags: discharge bankruptcy attorney discharge of bankruptcy order chapter 13 and 7 bankruptcy discharge