Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices
Under state and federal law, business transactions that mislead or defraud consumers may be found to be unfair and deceptive trade practices punishable with fines and penalties. Those practices are generally recognized as business torts. Individuals and companies found to have utilized unfair and deceptive trade practices may also be found liable for any harm caused to customers.
Some common examples of unfair and deceptive trade practices include the following:
- Fraud;
- False advertising;
- “Bait and switch” marketing tactics;
- Selling counterfeit goods;
- Failure to disclose important product information;
- Overcharging customers or price-fixing;
- Misrepresenting used goods as new;
- Failure to disclose loan conditions;
- Libeling or slandering another company’s product or services; and
- Enrolling customers in automatically renewing programs without disclosing the terms.
The experienced attorneys at Thomas H. Curran Associates have the experience necessary to represent businesses and consumers who have been victimized by unfair and deceptive trade practices as well as those defending themselves from unfounded claims. Our lawyers will help clients resolve their claims through either alternative dispute resolution or court litigation to ensure they receive the best possible results.
Litigation Practice Results
Recent successful cases handled by the attorneys at Thomas H. Curran Associates. Find more here »
Supreme Court Denies Final Appeal, Finalizing Judgement Obtained by THCA
On June 24, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States declined the petition to review filed by Sean Dunne and his ex-wife Gayle...
Thomas H. Curran Associates Secures Appellate Victory as Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Denies Appellant’s Attempt to Shortcut Ordinary Appellate Review
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently obtained an appellate victory in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on May 26, 2023, in the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates win is Affirmed in Florida, U.S. District Court – Client Wins Attorneys Fees
Law: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) Case: Premier Capital, LLC v. Larry Bryan (AP) Underlying Bankruptcy Case: In re Larry Bryan...
The Second Circuit Affirms Bankruptcy Fraud Judgment Obtained by Thomas H. Curran Associates, Recognizing the Continuous Concealment Doctrine
Law: Continuous concealment doctrine, 11 USC § 727(a)(2)(A), In re Olivier, 819 F.2d 550 (5th Cir. 1987); In re Boyer, 328 F. App’x 711,...
Thomas H. Curran Associates prevails on barring discharge due to fraud by debtor
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently secured a victory on behalf of an institutional asset manager, where the Bankruptcy Court for the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates prevails on post-trial motions and obtains full security for $23 million dollar financial fraud judgment on behalf of chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee
On February 8, 2022, the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Meyer, J.) enter its Order denying defendant Gayle...
Supreme Court Denies Final Appeal, Finalizing Judgement Obtained by THCA
On June 24, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States declined the petition to review filed by Sean Dunne and his ex-wife Gayle...
Thomas H. Curran Associates Secures Appellate Victory as Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Denies Appellant’s Attempt to Shortcut Ordinary Appellate Review
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently obtained an appellate victory in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on May 26, 2023, in the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates win is Affirmed in Florida, U.S. District Court – Client Wins Attorneys Fees
Law: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) Case: Premier Capital, LLC v. Larry Bryan (AP) Underlying Bankruptcy Case: In re Larry Bryan...
The Second Circuit Affirms Bankruptcy Fraud Judgment Obtained by Thomas H. Curran Associates, Recognizing the Continuous Concealment Doctrine
Law: Continuous concealment doctrine, 11 USC § 727(a)(2)(A), In re Olivier, 819 F.2d 550 (5th Cir. 1987); In re Boyer, 328 F. App’x 711,...
Supreme Court Denies Final Appeal, Finalizing Judgement Obtained by THCA
On June 24, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States declined the petition to review filed by Sean Dunne and his ex-wife Gayle...
Thomas H. Curran Associates Secures Appellate Victory as Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Denies Appellant’s Attempt to Shortcut Ordinary Appellate Review
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently obtained an appellate victory in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on May 26, 2023, in the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates win is Affirmed in Florida, U.S. District Court – Client Wins Attorneys Fees
Law: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) Case: Premier Capital, LLC v. Larry Bryan (AP) Underlying Bankruptcy Case: In re Larry Bryan...
Litigation Areas of Expertise
Litigation News
Disciplinary judge approves lawyer’s suspension for using ChatGPT to generate fake cases | Colorado Politics
Recently, a Colorado lawyer received disciplinary action for employing artificial intelligence to generate fake case citations in a legal...
US appeals court proposes AI restrictions in all court filings | Jurist
In November, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit proposed a new rule requiring lawyers to certify that they either did not use...
Mallinckrodt’s Second Bankruptcy Would cut $1 Billion from Opioid Settlement | STL Today
The Irish based company, Mallinckrodt’s, second bankruptcy may place creditors in ownership of the company and cut $1 billion from the...
The FTC’s case against Microsoft’s Activision acquisition is not going well | Vox
Microsoft and Activision Blizzard are overcoming hurdles to their $69 billion dollar merger. If the merger goes through, Microsoft will...
California Rejects Viking River, Allows PAGA Claims to Proceed | JDSUPRA
Case: Adolph v. Uber Tech., Inc. The California Supreme Court recently rejected the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Private...
Supreme Court allows construction to resume on the Mountain Valley Pipeline | AP News
The Court’s ruling affirmed that, in some instances, Congress may have power over federal courts. The pipeline has faced significant...
Disciplinary judge approves lawyer’s suspension for using ChatGPT to generate fake cases | Colorado Politics
Recently, a Colorado lawyer received disciplinary action for employing artificial intelligence to generate fake case citations in a legal...
US appeals court proposes AI restrictions in all court filings | Jurist
In November, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit proposed a new rule requiring lawyers to certify that they either did not use...
Mallinckrodt’s Second Bankruptcy Would cut $1 Billion from Opioid Settlement | STL Today
The Irish based company, Mallinckrodt’s, second bankruptcy may place creditors in ownership of the company and cut $1 billion from the...
The FTC’s case against Microsoft’s Activision acquisition is not going well | Vox
Microsoft and Activision Blizzard are overcoming hurdles to their $69 billion dollar merger. If the merger goes through, Microsoft will...
Disciplinary judge approves lawyer’s suspension for using ChatGPT to generate fake cases | Colorado Politics
Recently, a Colorado lawyer received disciplinary action for employing artificial intelligence to generate fake case citations in a legal...
US appeals court proposes AI restrictions in all court filings | Jurist
In November, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit proposed a new rule requiring lawyers to certify that they either did not use...
Mallinckrodt’s Second Bankruptcy Would cut $1 Billion from Opioid Settlement | STL Today
The Irish based company, Mallinckrodt’s, second bankruptcy may place creditors in ownership of the company and cut $1 billion from the...
Contact Us
Are You In Need of Legal Counsel for Commercial Litigation, Business Transaction Matters, or a Bankruptcy Matter?
Contact our team today.
Call us at (617) 207-8670 or use the quick contact form below.
Austin Office
111 Congress Avenue
Suite 500
Austin, TX 78701
Boston Office
75 State St
Suite 100
Boston, MA 02109
New York Office
17 State St
40th Floor
New York, NY 10004
London Office
The Leadenhall Building
Level 30
122 Leadenhall Street
London EC3V 4AB
Tags: unfair and deceptive trade practices deceptive trade practices unfair trade practice law