Corporate Veil Piercing
One of the primary reasons businesses choose to operate as corporations or limited liability companies is to insulate ownership from liability for the actions or debts of the company.
However, in certain situations, the courts will allow parties to “pierce the veil” of the corporate or LLC business structure to impose personal liability on some, or all, of its owners.
A court may ignore a business’s identity as a corporation or LLC and hold individual stakeholders liable when it finds that those who did business with the company were left with unpaid judgments or bills as the result of either the business operating as the alter ego of its owners or the company having acted in a wrongful or fraudulent manner.
Under the alter ego doctrine, when the owners of a corporation or LLC fail to maintain formal legal separation between their personal activities and those of their business, a court may find the business structure was a sham. Courts often invoke the alter ego doctrine after finding several of the following:
- Personal funds were intermingled with business funds;
- Failure to observe corporate formalities;
- Owners treating business assets as their own;
- Absence of business records;
- Non-payment of dividends;
- Lack of officers and directors; or
- The business was grossly under-capitalized.
Businesses that closely adhere to their corporate bylaws or LLC operating agreements are usually allowed to maintain their veil and shield their owners from personal responsibility for their companies’ liabilities.
The experienced attorneys at Thomas H. Curran Associates represent both business owners who are being personally sued for the liabilities of their corporation or LLC and creditors seeking to collect debts by piercing a company’s veil. Our attorneys can also provide guidance to corporations and LLCs seeking to ensure they are adhering to their corporate bylaws or operating agreements in a manner that will shield their owners from personal liability for the actions of the business.
Litigation Practice Results
Recent successful cases handled by the attorneys Thomas H. Curran Associates. Find more here »
Supreme Court Denies Final Appeal, Finalizing Judgement Obtained by THCA
On June 24, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States declined the petition to review filed by Sean Dunne and his ex-wife Gayle...
Thomas H. Curran Associates Secures Appellate Victory as Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Denies Appellant’s Attempt to Shortcut Ordinary Appellate Review
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently obtained an appellate victory in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on May 26, 2023, in the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates win is Affirmed in Florida, U.S. District Court – Client Wins Attorneys Fees
Law: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) Case: Premier Capital, LLC v. Larry Bryan (AP) Underlying Bankruptcy Case: In re Larry Bryan...
The Second Circuit Affirms Bankruptcy Fraud Judgment Obtained by Thomas H. Curran Associates, Recognizing the Continuous Concealment Doctrine
Law: Continuous concealment doctrine, 11 USC § 727(a)(2)(A), In re Olivier, 819 F.2d 550 (5th Cir. 1987); In re Boyer, 328 F. App’x 711,...
Thomas H. Curran Associates prevails on barring discharge due to fraud by debtor
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently secured a victory on behalf of an institutional asset manager, where the Bankruptcy Court for the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates prevails on post-trial motions and obtains full security for $23 million dollar financial fraud judgment on behalf of chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee
On February 8, 2022, the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Meyer, J.) enter its Order denying defendant Gayle...
Litigation Areas of Expertise
Litigation News
Disciplinary judge approves lawyer’s suspension for using ChatGPT to generate fake cases | Colorado Politics
Recently, a Colorado lawyer received disciplinary action for employing artificial intelligence to generate fake case citations in a legal...
US appeals court proposes AI restrictions in all court filings | Jurist
In November, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit proposed a new rule requiring lawyers to certify that they either did not use...
Mallinckrodt’s Second Bankruptcy Would cut $1 Billion from Opioid Settlement | STL Today
The Irish based company, Mallinckrodt’s, second bankruptcy may place creditors in ownership of the company and cut $1 billion from the...
The FTC’s case against Microsoft’s Activision acquisition is not going well | Vox
Microsoft and Activision Blizzard are overcoming hurdles to their $69 billion dollar merger. If the merger goes through, Microsoft will...
California Rejects Viking River, Allows PAGA Claims to Proceed | JDSUPRA
Case: Adolph v. Uber Tech., Inc. The California Supreme Court recently rejected the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Private...
Supreme Court allows construction to resume on the Mountain Valley Pipeline | AP News
The Court’s ruling affirmed that, in some instances, Congress may have power over federal courts. The pipeline has faced significant...
Disciplinary judge approves lawyer’s suspension for using ChatGPT to generate fake cases | Colorado Politics
Recently, a Colorado lawyer received disciplinary action for employing artificial intelligence to generate fake case citations in a legal...
US appeals court proposes AI restrictions in all court filings | Jurist
In November, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit proposed a new rule requiring lawyers to certify that they either did not use...
Mallinckrodt’s Second Bankruptcy Would cut $1 Billion from Opioid Settlement | STL Today
The Irish based company, Mallinckrodt’s, second bankruptcy may place creditors in ownership of the company and cut $1 billion from the...
The FTC’s case against Microsoft’s Activision acquisition is not going well | Vox
Microsoft and Activision Blizzard are overcoming hurdles to their $69 billion dollar merger. If the merger goes through, Microsoft will...
Disciplinary judge approves lawyer’s suspension for using ChatGPT to generate fake cases | Colorado Politics
Recently, a Colorado lawyer received disciplinary action for employing artificial intelligence to generate fake case citations in a legal...
US appeals court proposes AI restrictions in all court filings | Jurist
In November, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit proposed a new rule requiring lawyers to certify that they either did not use...
Mallinckrodt’s Second Bankruptcy Would cut $1 Billion from Opioid Settlement | STL Today
The Irish based company, Mallinckrodt’s, second bankruptcy may place creditors in ownership of the company and cut $1 billion from the...
Contact Us
Are You In Need of Legal Counsel for Commercial Litigation, Business Transaction Matters, or a Bankruptcy Matter?
Contact our team today.
Call us at (617) 207-8670 or use the quick contact form below.
Austin Office
111 Congress Avenue
Suite 500
Austin, TX 78701
Boston Office
75 State Street
Suite 100
Boston, MA 02109
New York Office
17 State Street
40th Floor
New York, NY 10004
London Office
The Leadenhall Building
Level 30
122 Leadenhall Street
London EC3V 4AB
Tags: corporate veil piercing piercing the corporate veil alter ego doctrine