Bankruptcy Subchapter 5 Representation
Subchapter V Small Business Representation
The Small Business Reorganization (SBR) Act of 2019 added a new Subchapter V (Subchapter 5) under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code to give small businesses a faster, less burdensome, and less expensive option for reorganization. The law went into effect on February 19, 2020, and made Subchapter V bankruptcy available to businesses with less than $2,725,625 in aggregate secured and unsecured noncontingent and liquidated debt.
Shortly after the SBR Act went into effect, some of its Subchapter V provisions were amended by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act that was signed into law March 28, 2020. The CARES Act expanded the number of businesses eligible for Subchapter V by increasing the debt limit to $7.5 million for one year. After one year, the debt limit will return to $2,725,625.
Filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy often involves a lengthy process to modify or discharge business debt using a reorganization plan that has been approved by at least one class of impaired creditors and the Bankruptcy Court. Some small businesses found Chapter 11 proceedings were too difficult and expensive to serve as a practical tool for reorganization and either abandoned the idea of filing for bankruptcy or were forced to liquidate under Chapter 7.
The key benefits of Subchapter V bankruptcy include:
- Continued Ownership and Management. So long as unsecured creditors are paid using the debtor’s disposable income for a period of three to five years under a reorganization plan, equity holders will continue to own and manage the business. Disposable income is defined as income that is not needed to pay the expenses necessary to continue the debtor’s business operations.
- 90 Days to File a Plan. Debtors must file a plan no later than 90 days after entering bankruptcy unless a judge orders otherwise. Additionally, only the debtor may file a plan for reorganization.
- No Disclosure Statement. The disclosure statement that must be filed by most Chapter 11 debtors is not required in a Subchapter V bankruptcy unless ordered by the court for cause. A Chapter 11 disclosure statement usually includes such things as a brief history of the debtor’s business operations, a liquidation analysis, and projections regarding the debtor’s ability to make payments under the plan.
- No Creditors’ Committee. Under Subchapter V, no committee of creditors will be appointed unless ordered by the Bankruptcy Court.
- No Creditor Approval Needed. A reorganization plan can be confirmed without the vote of an impaired accepting class so long as the plan is deemed fair and equitable to each class of claims and does not discriminate unfairly.
- Delayed Payment of Administrative Expenses. In a traditional Chapter 11 case, administrative expense claims must be paid on the effective date of the reorganization plan, but a Subchapter V debtor may stretch those payments over the term of the plan.
- Specialized Trustee Appointed. The debtor continues to manage the business, but one or more Subchapter V trustees will be appointed to monitor the debtor’s affairs, evaluate the debtor’s assets, assess the debtor’s prospect for success, and offer recommendations regarding the confirmation of the debtor’s plan.
To elect Subchapter V bankruptcy, a debtor must qualify as a small business debtor engaged in commercial or business activities that have aggregate noncontingent liquidated secured and unsecured debt of not more than $7.5 million ($2,725,625 after March 27, 2021), excluding debts owed affiliates or insiders. At least 50% of that debt must be from the debtor’s commercial or business activities. Finally, the commercial or business activities of an eligible small business debtor include those of any affiliate but exclude any person whose primary activity is owning single-asset real estate.
Our attorneys at Thomas H. Curran Associates are ready to provide guidance and representation to businesses considering Subchapter V bankruptcy. Our attorneys are experienced in all forms of bankruptcy representation and will utilize that experience to successfully guide businesses through their Subchapter V bankruptcy proceedings.
Bankruptcy Practice Results
Recent successful cases handled by the attorneys from Thomas H. Curran Associates. Find more here »
Supreme Court Denies Final Appeal, Finalizing Judgement Obtained by THCA
On June 24, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States declined the petition to review filed by Sean Dunne and his ex-wife Gayle...
Thomas H. Curran Associates Secures Appellate Victory as Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Denies Appellant’s Attempt to Shortcut Ordinary Appellate Review
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently obtained an appellate victory in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on May 26, 2023, in the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates win is Affirmed in Florida, U.S. District Court – Client Wins Attorneys Fees
Law: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) Case: Premier Capital, LLC v. Larry Bryan (AP) Underlying Bankruptcy Case: In re Larry Bryan...
The Second Circuit Affirms Bankruptcy Fraud Judgment Obtained by Thomas H. Curran Associates, Recognizing the Continuous Concealment Doctrine
Law: Continuous concealment doctrine, 11 USC § 727(a)(2)(A), In re Olivier, 819 F.2d 550 (5th Cir. 1987); In re Boyer, 328 F. App’x 711,...
Thomas H. Curran Associates prevails on barring discharge due to fraud by debtor
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently secured a victory on behalf of an institutional asset manager, where the Bankruptcy Court for the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates prevails on post-trial motions and obtains full security for $23 million dollar financial fraud judgment on behalf of chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee
On February 8, 2022, the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Meyer, J.) enter its Order denying defendant Gayle...
Supreme Court Denies Final Appeal, Finalizing Judgement Obtained by THCA
On June 24, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States declined the petition to review filed by Sean Dunne and his ex-wife Gayle...
Thomas H. Curran Associates Secures Appellate Victory as Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Denies Appellant’s Attempt to Shortcut Ordinary Appellate Review
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently obtained an appellate victory in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on May 26, 2023, in the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates win is Affirmed in Florida, U.S. District Court – Client Wins Attorneys Fees
Law: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) Case: Premier Capital, LLC v. Larry Bryan (AP) Underlying Bankruptcy Case: In re Larry Bryan...
The Second Circuit Affirms Bankruptcy Fraud Judgment Obtained by Thomas H. Curran Associates, Recognizing the Continuous Concealment Doctrine
Law: Continuous concealment doctrine, 11 USC § 727(a)(2)(A), In re Olivier, 819 F.2d 550 (5th Cir. 1987); In re Boyer, 328 F. App’x 711,...
Supreme Court Denies Final Appeal, Finalizing Judgement Obtained by THCA
On June 24, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States declined the petition to review filed by Sean Dunne and his ex-wife Gayle...
Thomas H. Curran Associates Secures Appellate Victory as Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Denies Appellant’s Attempt to Shortcut Ordinary Appellate Review
Thomas H. Curran Associates recently obtained an appellate victory in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on May 26, 2023, in the...
Thomas H. Curran Associates win is Affirmed in Florida, U.S. District Court – Client Wins Attorneys Fees
Law: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) Case: Premier Capital, LLC v. Larry Bryan (AP) Underlying Bankruptcy Case: In re Larry Bryan...
Bankruptcy Areas of Expertise
- Bankruptcy Litigation
- Bankruptcy Trustee Representation
- Avoidance & Recovery Actions
- Chapter 11 Trustees & Examiners
- Discharge Litigation
- Bankruptcy Fraud Investigations
- Cross Border Foreign Litigation
- 363 Bankruptcy Sales
- Bankruptcy Preference Actions
- Involuntary Bankruptcy
- Chapter 11/13 Plan Objections
Bankruptcy News
Evidence of Intent to ‘Hinder’ Wasn’t Sufficient to Deny Discharge, District Judge Says
In the recent case Wylie v. Miller, 22-10952 (S.D. Mich. March 29, 2024) [1] , a bankruptcy court’s decision to deny a couple’s discharge...
Creditor’s Don’t Receive Estate Assets Recovered After the Last Chapter 13 Plan Payment
In In re McCrorey, 18-00696 (Bankr. D. Idaho Jan. 26, 2024) [1] , Chief Bankruptcy Judge Noah G. Hillen of Boise, Idaho, held that if a...
Electric Scooter Company Bird files for Bankruptcy | CNBC
Bird, the popular electric scooter rental company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Florida Federal Court last month. Bird's...
Nearly 20-year-old Dallas restaurant chain files for Ch. 7 bankruptcy | WFAA-TV
The Dallas-based company Buzzbrews Inc. filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection lasat month in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the...
A Refinanced Consumer Loan Might Not Be a ‘Consumer Debt,’ Ninth Circuit Says
In Centennial Bank v. Kane (In re Kane), 22-16282 (9th Cir. Nov. 15, 2023), the debtor had refinanced four preexisting loans. [1] The...
Bankruptcy Code Overrides Contrary Delaware Corporate Law, Judge Lopez Says
In In re Envision Healthcare Corp., 23-90342 (Bankr. S.D. Tx. Sec. 12, 2023), Bankruptcy Judge Christopher M. Lopez held that Delaware law...
Evidence of Intent to ‘Hinder’ Wasn’t Sufficient to Deny Discharge, District Judge Says
In the recent case Wylie v. Miller, 22-10952 (S.D. Mich. March 29, 2024) [1] , a bankruptcy court’s decision to deny a couple’s discharge...
Creditor’s Don’t Receive Estate Assets Recovered After the Last Chapter 13 Plan Payment
In In re McCrorey, 18-00696 (Bankr. D. Idaho Jan. 26, 2024) [1] , Chief Bankruptcy Judge Noah G. Hillen of Boise, Idaho, held that if a...
Electric Scooter Company Bird files for Bankruptcy | CNBC
Bird, the popular electric scooter rental company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Florida Federal Court last month. Bird's...
Nearly 20-year-old Dallas restaurant chain files for Ch. 7 bankruptcy | WFAA-TV
The Dallas-based company Buzzbrews Inc. filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection lasat month in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the...
Evidence of Intent to ‘Hinder’ Wasn’t Sufficient to Deny Discharge, District Judge Says
In the recent case Wylie v. Miller, 22-10952 (S.D. Mich. March 29, 2024) [1] , a bankruptcy court’s decision to deny a couple’s discharge...
Creditor’s Don’t Receive Estate Assets Recovered After the Last Chapter 13 Plan Payment
In In re McCrorey, 18-00696 (Bankr. D. Idaho Jan. 26, 2024) [1] , Chief Bankruptcy Judge Noah G. Hillen of Boise, Idaho, held that if a...
Electric Scooter Company Bird files for Bankruptcy | CNBC
Bird, the popular electric scooter rental company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Florida Federal Court last month. Bird's...
Contact Us
Are You In Need of Legal Counsel for a Bankruptcy Matter, Business Transaction, or Commercial Litigation?
Contact our team today.
Call us at (617) 207-8670 or use the quick contact form below.
Austin Office
111 Congress Avenue
Suite 500
Austin, TX 78701
Boston Office
75 State Street
Suite 100
Boston, MA 02109
New York Office
17 State Street
40th Floor
New York, NY 10004
London Office
The Leadenhall Building
Level 30
122 Leadenhall Street
London EC3V 4AB
Tags: bankruptcy subchapter 5 representation bankruptcy subchapter V representation bankruptcy subchapter 5 business representation